Hello, I've developed an application using Electron with JAVACRIPT. I have managed to deploy to both Windows and the web but having trouble deploying the application to my Mac users.
It's my first time deploying an application for Mac but feel like I'm stuck at the last hurdle and out of ideas so I'm reaching out for help.
My application is successfully signing but during the build and when my Notarize.js is running it seems to get stuck indefinitely.
I can check and see the status of the Notarize attempts but they seem to be stuck "In Progress". Here are the logs.
Successfully received submission history.
history
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-06T00:59:45.245Z
id: 1dc39b5f-fdca-4bf2-a6f6-fa793de2786e
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-04T08:01:36.168Z
id: c575b015-edd6-4e09-8da5-7ae09f4f67db
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T08:30:31.528Z
id: 570ae540-8cce-4418-ab09-7f6be33dc245
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T07:57:56.701Z
id: 42748de8-026a-4663-9fd2-88c7608588d3
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T06:30:19.569Z
id: 5140caa0-df14-491a-b148-82015f9856da
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T05:56:28.916Z
id: 535c6be1-4999-4b3e-9766-42512a8deb67
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T02:51:04.893Z
id: ead2268c-62b2-4b4b-8850-c1cdb5313d6a
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T01:50:51.954Z
id: d0c44281-a788-4704-a057-4620d284516d
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-03T00:48:54.445Z
id: 3d13727c-06a3-49d7-902b-4001522107c3
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T13:35:26.715Z
id: 1823a550-a9ff-467a-8a60-dd3e42305258
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T13:23:41.894Z
id: cbc341a2-9a51-43d6-83ae-713443c84fec
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T12:21:44.561Z
id: 1af34419-655f-49b8-bea0-05b4232c46a7
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T11:34:03.732Z
id: 8c4ab3b5-2ea9-4220-9667-94011bcf76fb
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T11:19:16.052Z
id: 093dfb8a-9058-417d-acd3-8ea5d0bb654a
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T11:13:14.676Z
id: 556b7c1c-d114-4717-b0f7-4f1614ada845
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T10:52:36.834Z
id: ce3d3c8a-d218-4978-8757-2ca9d12aad76
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T09:27:13.535Z
id: b65ec764-baab-444d-809b-e4242d70548b
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T09:27:01.176Z
id: be228acc-e6a2-48f2-937b-5b2962275052
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T09:19:19.182Z
id: d99fc10b-c424-4d0c-a2aa-37a9e9165d91
name: Popcorn-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T08:55:43.064Z
id: 2e7f8df7-9c0b-4dd0-8df7-8f3428c0bfa0
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T08:19:48.676Z
id: 678355da-e413-4b1a-92a8-776a6ff6a055
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T07:58:48.278Z
id: 8591f8d7-1d57-4e80-af90-d77190160a20
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T07:54:41.193Z
id: f029dfeb-3f14-4f65-83e2-d9356ef6ac00
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T07:27:50.613Z
id: 574f2563-d533-4885-947a-2f57170196af
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T07:09:54.203Z
id: 589f7f3a-d231-4911-8ad6-9d2c15a61ac0
name: popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T05:39:02.574Z
id: 9edd43de-6d14-4743-87fc-ab570bee7399
name: Popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T04:36:12.342Z
id: ba02116d-1aad-4521-8667-ad086b14c1cb
name: Popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-01-02T03:22:49.185Z
id: b8585c81-b7f5-4c35-9bd6-62157c6ce4bc
name: Popcorn.zip
status: In Progress
Demystify code signing and its importance in app development. Get help troubleshooting code signing issues and ensure your app is properly signed for distribution.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hey devs,
I have a really weird issue and at this point I cannot determine is it a Big Sur 11.1 or M1 issue or just some macOS settings issue.
Short description
programatically (from node, electron) I'd like to store x509 cert to keychain. I got the following error message:
SecTrustSettingsSetTrustSettings: The authorization was denied since no user interaction was possible. (1) I could reproduce this issue on: a brand new mac mini with M1 chip and Big Sur 11.1
another brand new mac mini with M1 chip and Big Sur 11.1
a 2018 MacBook pro with Intel chip and Big Sur 11.1
I couldn't reproduce this issue on: 2020 MacBook pro with intel i9 chip and Big Sur 11.1
2020 MacBook pro with intel i9 chip and Big Sur 11.0
How am I trying to store the cert
node test.js
test.js
const { exec } = require('child_process')
exec(
	`osascript -e 'do shell script "security add-trusted-cert -d -r trustRoot -k /Library/Keychains/System.keychain /Users/kotapeter/ssl/testsite.local.crt" with prompt "Test APP wants to store SSL certification to keychain." with administrator privileges'`,
	(error, stdout, stderr) => {
		if (error) {
			console.log(error.stack)
			console.log(`Error code: ${error.code}`)
			console.log(`Signal received: ${error.signal}`)
		}
		console.log(`STDOUT: ${stdout}`)
		console.log(`STDERR: ${stderr}`)
		process.exit(1)
	}
)
testsite.local.crt:
----BEGIN CERTIFICATE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----END CERTIFICATE
testsite.local.key:
----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY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----END RSA PRIVATE KEY
What I've already found
If I run the following command from terminal It asks my password first in terminal and after that It asks my password again in OS password prompt.
sudo security add-trusted-cert -d -r trustRoot -k /Library/Keychains/System.keychain /Users/kotapeter/ssl/testsite.local.crt
It looks like I'm getting the above error message because osascript hides the second password asking dialog.
The cert always gets stored in keychain but when I get the error message the cert "Trust" value is not "Always Trust".
References
StackOverflow question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65699160/electron-import-x509-cert-to-local-keychain-macos-the-authorization-was-deni
opened issue on sudo-prompt electron package: https://github.com/jorangreef/sudo-prompt/issues/137
Whilst waiting for the company developer account I successfully notarised an app/pkg
On switching to the company account the app/pkg has been stuck in progress for over 2 days (see below)
The initial submission was via Xcode and later via command line.
The last one was when I updated bundle ids etc and built with Github Actions.
The initial submission did coincide with a service outage, however that is marked as resolved.
I would like to cancel all of them now that I have switched the signing account and the bundle ID but there seems no way to do this?
Thoughts and comments welcome.
Thanks
Paul
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-08-14T11:03:24.837Z
id: edf215d0-4d15-4075-aa6f-4755a35b3d45
name: ZenityEndpointAgent.pkg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-08-12T21:36:36.345Z
id: 9c98de09-d3aa-449b-ad47-7e721b0342c5
name: AIEdgeDeviceAgent.pkg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-08-12T16:58:50.891Z
id: 9206f9be-0fc4-4c6c-aa66-8fcbe3332155
name: AIEdgeDeviceAgent.pkg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-08-12T10:37:35.624Z
id: b20d1dd0-084e-441c-87a6-641fb088819e
name: AIEdge Device Agent.zip
status: In Progress
Dears, this is my first ever piece of code on Mac. I wanted to try ShazamKit. I created App Id and enabled App Service ShazamKit. I properly configured my app (a very small test app) with the proper boundle id, Team and entitlements file. I keep receiving this error in the Signing in section:
Automatic signing failed
Xcode failed to provision this target. Please address the following issues preventing automatic signing from creating a valid profile.
Entitlement com.apple.developer.shazamkit not found and could not be included in profile. This likely is not a valid entitlement and should be removed from your entitlements file
I noticed the message is mentioning "profile"...does it refer to a "Profile" as in "Certificate"/"Identifiers"/"Devices"/"Profiles"/"Keys"/"Services" option? I did not create any "Profile". I just enabled the App Service under "Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles"=>"Identifiers"=>"Edit your App ID Configuration"=>"App Services"
Thx!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Hi,
I just released a new version of an app that was transferred from another developer account.
The previous version of this app used the App Groups feature to store some important data, and I would like to retrieve that data.
In the new version, I’m using the same bundle identifier and the same App Group ID (which has already been deleted from the original developer account). I also added the App Groups entitlement in the project settings and set the same App Group ID. However, I still cannot access the data in the App Group.
From the documentation and issues I’ve found, it seems that an app should still have permission to access the same App Group after being transferred.
Did I miss something?
Thanks!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Files and Storage
iOS
Entitlements
Provisioning Profiles
In the LightweightCodeRequirements framework, there is a LaunchCodeRequirement object which can be used as a requirement object for a Process for example.
What I don't understand (I admit my macOS low-level knowledge is limited) is that how can this be used in a secure way that doesn't fall victim of a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use issue.
e.g.
I specify a LaunchCodeRequirement via Process.launchRequirement for my process, let's say /usr/local/bin/mycommandlinetool.
The LaunchCodeRequirement specifies my development team and a developer ID certificate.
The process must be started in some form, before a SecCode/SecTask object can be created, rather than a SecStaticCode object (which only guarantees its validity checks to be intact as long as the file is not modified).
But if the process was started, then I have no tools in my set to prevent it from executing its initialization code or similar. Then, by the time I'm able to check via SecCode/SecTask functions the LaunchCodeRequirement, I might have already ran malicious code - if mycommandlinetool was maliciously replaced.
Or does the operating system use a daemon to copy the executable specified for Process to a secure location, then creates the SecStaticCode object, assesses the LaunchCodeRequirement and if passed, launches the executable from that trusted location (which would make sure it is immutable for replacement by malicious actors)?
I have a hard time understanding how this works under the hood - if I remember correctly these are private APIs.
I'm developing an app using Electron Builder for a potential port to Windows in the future. I've had a heck of a time getting credentials to work and felt like I was in some sort of time loop doing the same things over and over again to no avail. I finally was able to sign my app, sign the .dmg and start the notarization process. That was last night and it still says "In Progress". If anyone is able to push it through, that would be awesome! (id: 2520e724-7069-408a-9ea4-60b23e8435a7)
I saw another thread on here where people stated it was taking forever, I'm not sure if this is just because its my first time, but I was hoping to get a beta out to testers this weekend. I just need a version that doesn't get flagged as "Malware" by Gatekeeper. This is just for a standalone macOS application, not the App Store.
Is there a reason that this process takes an absurd amount of time? Will it always be like this or is this just a fluke and it was a bad time to try?
Background
We are using a Developer ID application certificate to sign our application. We lost the private key and we need to revoke it before we can receive a new one.
Per documentation (https://developer.apple.com/support/certificates/), I know that previously installed applications will still be able to run, but new installations will not be able to work.
I want to confirm what will happen when we revoke the certificate so we know how to prepare customers for this upcoming change.
Questions Will existing installations of the application receive a notice that the certificate has been revoked?
Will previously installed applications be able to launch again after they are closed?
What will the user see when they try to install the application with the revoked certificate?
Xcode automatic signing consistently fails for the macOS target when adding the App Groups capability, even though the Developer Portal is correctly configured.
Error:
Provisioning profile “Mac Team Provisioning Profile: com.example.testapp.mobile” doesn’t support the App Groups capability.
Setup:
• Bundle ID: com.example.testapp.mobile
• App Group: $(TeamIdentifierPrefix)group.com.example.testapp.mobile
Troubleshooting Steps Tried (None Helped):
• Changed bundle identifiers and deleted/recreated them in the Developer Portal
• Deleted and recreated App Groups
• Removed and re-added the developer account in Xcode
• Deleted all provisioning profiles from the system
• Cleared Derived Data and Xcode caches
• Even tried on a clean macOS system
This setup used to work previously. The issue seems to have started after the Apple Developer account was renewed.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
We've been trying to get the CarPlay Navigation Entitlement for a couple years now without much luck.
Did you have a similar experience? How did you succeed getting the entitlement?
Part of the form requires us to submit Screenshots. Did you provide screenshots of your on-device experience or wireframe for CarPlay?
How was your experience?
We were recently approved for the "User Assigned Device Name" for a specific app Identifier. The "Additional Capabilities" tab isn't present on that App ID. I am an admin in the developer portal, and this does not appear for the account holder as well. Any help would be appreciated.
I've been successfully notarizing my apps for a year or so now, with intermittent releases every so often, usually succeeding with notarization in a couple of minutes.
These apps are all written in Python, but I worked through all the jank required to get them to notarize cleanly a while ago and have no issues since.
Today I submitted a couple of builds which have been stuck for hours. They're just "in progress", so no logs I can look at, no emails or anything on my developer account page.
How can I begin to debug this?
Successfully received submission info
createdDate: 2025-06-24T18:43:37.140Z
id: 8d1a1ca9-f0ad-426f-a714-89aaf9e01a07
name: pinpal-2025.6.25.for-notarizing.app.zip
status: In Progress
I should note that in addition to the comment added within 10 minutes of creation of this issue, within the last day, we also have:
https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/789389
https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/789599
https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/789995
So it seems pretty likely something is going on on the backend.
I am using the xcrun notarytool submit --apple-id xxxxx@gmail.com --password xxxxx--team-id xxxxxx --output-format json --wait --no-progress /my/dmg/file
to notarize my DMG file. But it always gives me back the error,
Error: HTTP status code: 403. A required agreement is missing or has expired. This request requires an in-effect agreement that has not been signed or has expired. Ensure your team has signed the necessary legal agreements and that they are not expired.
I did log in my developer account and found no place to sign any agreement. Actually in the morning when I logged in the developer account, it indeed pop up the agreement for me to sign and I did sign it. But now it seems I don't have any more agreements to sign. So, any ideas about what I should do?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization
Hi guys,
I am new to the Apple Developer Program (enrolled a few days ago) and this is my first
app notarization attempt. I've been experiencing significant delays - all submissions
have been stuck at "In Progress" for over 24 hours.
Details:
macOS app signed with Developer ID Application certificate
Using xcrun notarytool with app-specific password
Hardened runtime enabled
codesign --verify --deep --strict passes
Team ID: QVHM976XC5
Submission IDs (all stuck "In Progress"):
5f494a89-0db0-4cc6-944f-ca2fe399e870 (latest - 8+ hours)
938f6b8d-0d00-45f5-861d-68fe470df6c2
d0edcbfe-8464-455f-b077-bebaa5b9aab7
I understand new developers may experience longer initial processing, but 24+ hours
seems excessive. Is there anything I should check or any additional steps required
for new accounts?
Any guidance appreciated.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization
Hello,
We are currently facing an issue with the Apple Notary Service that is completely blocking our production pipeline.
For the past three days, every single submission has been stuck in the "In Progress" state indefinitely. Some submissions have been pending for over 48 hours, and none of them ever proceed to analysis.
When checking the status via xcrun notarytool history, all entries show "In Progress". Attempting to retrieve logs with xcrun notarytool log always returns: Submission log is not yet available.
This strongly suggests that the processing hasn't even started. This issue occurs consistently from my local machine (MacBook Air M3) and Our GitHub Actions CI workflow.
Both environments are properly configured with Electron + Electron-Builder, and the app is correctly signed and uploaded each time. We have verified multiple times all credentials and code signing settings, no exceptions so far or problems in the pipeline.
Here are a few stuck submission IDs:
This is not a normal delay, it looks like a backend issue affecting our account or this specific App ID. Please escalate this case as soon as possible.
We appreciate your urgent attention.
Best
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization
In Xcode, under Signing & Capabilities (Release) for our bundle ID
the selected provisioning profile does include the entitlement:
com.apple.developer.payment-pass-provisioning
However, when we upload a new build to TestFlight, the Build Metadata →
Entitlements section for the same bundle ID does not include
com.apple.developer.payment-pass-provisioning.
Because of this, PKAddPaymentPassViewController does not open in TestFlight
builds.
This suggests that while the entitlement is enabled for the App ID and
visible in Xcode, it may not yet be propagated to App Store Connect’s
signing service for TestFlight/App Store builds.
Please Note: The Wallet Entitlements team had confirmed
that they had granted entitlements for our team and the apple IDs
Xcode : 26.0.1
Profile being used: Distribution Profile
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Wallet
Entitlements
Provisioning Profiles
TestFlight
I'm experiencing a persistent issue where all my notarization submissions remain stuck in "In Progress" indefinitely. This is my first time notarizing an app.
Environment:
macOS 26.2 (Tahoe)
Using xcrun notarytool submit
Team ID: Y7T24GD249
App: Electron-based desktop application (~400MB)
Stuck submissions (oldest to newest):
51412777-848c-4be1-a952-5ff32d6653f9 - Feb 4, 4:39 PM UTC (48+ hours)
9c4f94a1-d59a-4607-adf1-94c82fb4254b - Feb 4, 11:23 PM UTC
1c593512-ef55-4801-ba60-8b1bbc5a6f66 - Feb 4, 11:30 PM UTC
de66e5cf-143c-40ec-ba62-2f07609044b4 - Feb 5, 1:39 PM UTC
964b2196-ad2e-4503-b15f-dc7f6a996ef0 - Feb 5, 2:25 PM UTC
c8fdcccf-46cd-4609-bc33-faaa8fad696f - Feb 6, 5:11 PM UTC
What I've tried:
Verified Developer ID Application certificate is valid
Checked code signatures with codesign -vvv --deep --strict
Submitted both .zip and .dmg formats
Checked Apple System Status (shows operational)
notarytool log returns "Record not found" for all submissions
Is there a known issue affecting first-time notarization, or could my account be flagged? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization
Hello everyone,
I’ve been stuck for weeks on an issue with Family Controls + Device Activity entitlements in my iOS app, and Apple Developer Support has not provided a solution so far. I’m hoping someone here who has successfully implemented Family Controls + Device Activity can point me in the right direction.
About the App
• The app is a Digital Wellbeing app called Breakloop.
• It lets users select apps they want to block, requires them to complete a positive affirmation before opening those apps, and can re-block apps after a set time (e.g., 10 minutes).
• This functionality exactly matches the purpose of Family Controls and Device Activity APIs.
What Works So Far
• Family Controls capability is enabled in the main app target in Xcode.
• We have valid Apple Developer certificates (Apple Development) and a team account.
• The main app builds and runs fine when using Family Controls alone.
• We have App IDs for:
• bl.Breakloop (main app)
• bl.Breakloop.BreakloopMonitorExtension
• bl.Breakloop.BreakloopShieldConfigurationExtension
The Problem
The provisioning profiles for the extension targets (BreakloopMonitorExtension and BreakloopShieldConfigurationExtension) do not include the com.apple.developer.device-activity entitlement even though:
• The App IDs in the Developer Portal have Family Controls (Development) enabled.
• The extensions have the correct entitlements file with both:
com.apple.developer.family-controls
com.apple.developer.device-activity
• Xcode Signing & Capabilities points to the correct provisioning profile + certificate.
Because the provisioning profiles don’t include the entitlement, the build fails with:
Provisioning profile doesn't include the com.apple.developer.device-activity entitlement.
What Apple Support Said
Apple Support told me:
• “Family Controls grants access to Device Activity.”
• They cannot enable it manually or guarantee that profiles will include the entitlement.
• They sent links to the documentation but no further assistance.
What I Need Help With
1. Has anyone successfully built extensions using Family Controls + Device Activity?
2. Do I need to request any additional approval for Device Activity, or should it appear automatically once Family Controls is enabled?
3. Is there a known Xcode or Apple Developer Portal configuration issue that causes the entitlement to be missing in provisioning profiles?
4. Any working example of a project setup that uses Family Controls + Device Activity in extensions would be extremely helpful.
Extra Info
• We use the latest Xcode + iOS SDK.
• Tried recreating certificates, profiles, and App IDs multiple times.
• Followed Apple’s docs for Family Controls + Device Activity exactly.
I would greatly appreciate any guidance, especially from someone who has this working with iOS app extensions.
Thank you!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Entitlements
Family Controls
Device Activity
Screen Time
Hey,
Just recently I realized something I have been overlooking in my build pipelines.
I thought that by adding the the "hardened runtime", I disable 3rd-party library injection (I do not have the disable-library-validation entitlement added).
However, I was using some checks on my code and I noticed that the "library validation" code signature check fails on my applications (e.g. adding the .libraryValidation requirement via the LightweightCodeRequirements framework) - with codesign -dvvvv /path/to/app I can check it doesn't have the CS_REQUIRE_LV flag:
[...]
CodeDirectory v=20500 size=937 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=18+7 location=embedded
[...]
then I used in Xcode the "Other Code Signing Flags" setting and added the -o library option, which added the flag:
[...]
CodeDirectory v=20500 size=937 flags=0x12000(library-validation,runtime) hashes=18+7 location=embedded
[...]
Is this flag something I should be explicitly setting? Because I was under the impression enabling hardened runtime would be enough. Popular Developer ID distributed applications (e.g. Google Chrome, Parallels Desktop, Slack) all have this flag set.
Hi everyone,
I'm hoping someone can share their experience or offer advice on entitlement request timelines.
I previously had two bundle IDs approved for an app I'm testing via TestFlight - both were approved within a few days. I recently submitted a request for a third bundle ID (JMSHRM8W5J), and after realizing I may not have included enough detail, I submitted a follow-up request (XS2QYC59UU) with more context.
It's now been almost three weeks, which is significantly longer than my earlier approvals - though I recognize some of that time included the holidays.
A few questions for the community:
Has anyone experienced longer wait times for additional entitlements on an existing project (with approved entitlements)?
Did submitting a second request help or potentially slow things down?
Is there anything I should include in a request to improve chances of quick approval?
Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Family Controls
Device Activity
Managed Settings
Screen Time