Hi,
I’m building an iOS self accountability app using FamilyControls and DeviceActivity. I can show the user’s real Screen Time correctly inside a DeviceActivityReport extension on a real device, but I want to use that same daily total inside the main app for today’s log and leaderboard.
What I’m stuck on is getting that value back into the app. I tried App Groups, shared UserDefaults, a shared file in the app group container, and CFPreferences, but the report still only works as a display and the main app never receives the total.
Is there any Apple supported way to use the daily Screen Time total from a DeviceActivityReport extension inside the containing app, or is this intentionally display only?
Thanks.
Delve into the world of built-in app and system services available to developers. Discuss leveraging these services to enhance your app's functionality and user experience.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I am writing a DriverKit driver for the first that uses the USBSerialDriverKit. The driver its purpose is to expose the device as serial interface (/dev/cu.tetra-pei0 or something like this). My problem: I don't see any logs from that driver in the console and I tried like 40 different approaches and checked everything. The last message I see is that the driver get successfully added to the system it is in the list of active and enabled system driver extensions but when I plug the device in none of my logs appear and it doesn't show up in ioreg. So without my driver the target device looks like this:
+-o TETRA PEI interface@02120000 <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x10000297d, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (13 ms), retain 30>
| {
| "sessionID" = 268696051410
| "USBSpeed" = 3
| "UsbLinkSpeed" = 480000000
| "idProduct" = 36886
| "iManufacturer" = 1
| "bDeviceClass" = 0
| "IOPowerManagement" = {"PowerOverrideOn"=Yes,"DevicePowerState"=2,"CurrentPowerState"=2,"CapabilityFlags"=32768,"MaxPowerState"=2,"DriverPowerState"=0}
| "bcdDevice" = 9238
| "bMaxPacketSize0" = 64
| "iProduct" = 2
| "iSerialNumber" = 0
| "bNumConfigurations" = 1
| "UsbDeviceSignature" = <ad0c16901624000000ff0000>
| "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface"
| "locationID" = 34734080
| "bDeviceSubClass" = 0
| "bcdUSB" = 512
| "USB Address" = 6
| "kUSBCurrentConfiguration" = 1
| "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"9dc7b780-9ec0-11d4-a54f-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"}
| "UsbPowerSinkAllocation" = 500
| "bDeviceProtocol" = 0
| "USBPortType" = 0
| "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb"))
| "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc."
| "Device Speed" = 2
| "idVendor" = 3245
| "kUSBProductString" = "TETRA PEI interface"
| "kUSBAddress" = 6
| "kUSBVendorString" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc."
| }
|
+-o AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice <class AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice, id 0x100002982, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 5>
| {
| "IOProbeScore" = 50000
| "CFBundleIdentifier" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice"
| "IOProviderClass" = "IOUSBHostDevice"
| "IOClass" = "AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice"
| "IOPersonalityPublisher" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice"
| "bDeviceSubClass" = 0
| "CFBundleIdentifierKernel" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice"
| "IOMatchedAtBoot" = Yes
| "IOMatchCategory" = "IODefaultMatchCategory"
| "IOPrimaryDriverTerminateOptions" = Yes
| "bDeviceClass" = 0
| }
|
+-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostDeviceUserClient, id 0x100002983, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 7>
| {
| "IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent"
| "IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes
| }
|
+-o IOUSBHostInterface@0 <class IOUSBHostInterface, id 0x100002986, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (5 ms), retain 9>
| | {
| | "USBPortType" = 0
| | "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"2d9786c6-9ef3-11d4-ad51-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"}
| | "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc."
| | "bcdDevice" = 9238
| | "USBSpeed" = 3
| | "idProduct" = 36886
| | "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb"))
| | "bInterfaceSubClass" = 0
| | "bConfigurationValue" = 1
| | "locationID" = 34734080
| | "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface"
| | "bInterfaceProtocol" = 0
| | "iInterface" = 0
| | "bAlternateSetting" = 0
| | "idVendor" = 3245
| | "bInterfaceNumber" = 0
| | "bInterfaceClass" = 255
| | "bNumEndpoints" = 2
| | }
| |
| +-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostInterfaceUserClient, id 0x100002988, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 6>
| {
| "UsbUserClientBufferStatistics" = {"IOMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOBufferMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOSubMemoryDescriptor"=0}
| "IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent"
| "UsbUserClientBufferAllocations" = {"Bytes"=0,"Descriptors"=0}
| "IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes
| }
|
+-o IOUSBHostInterface@1 <class IOUSBHostInterface, id 0x100002987, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (5 ms), retain 9>
| {
| "USBPortType" = 0
| "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"2d9786c6-9ef3-11d4-ad51-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"}
| "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc."
| "bcdDevice" = 9238
| "USBSpeed" = 3
| "idProduct" = 36886
| "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb"))
| "bInterfaceSubClass" = 0
| "bConfigurationValue" = 1
| "locationID" = 34734080
| "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface"
| "bInterfaceProtocol" = 0
| "iInterface" = 0
| "bAlternateSetting" = 0
| "idVendor" = 3245
| "bInterfaceNumber" = 1
| "bInterfaceClass" = 255
| "bNumEndpoints" = 2
| }
|
+-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostInterfaceUserClient, id 0x10000298a, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 6>
{
"UsbUserClientBufferStatistics" = {"IOMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOBufferMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOSubMemoryDescriptor"=0}
"IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent"
"UsbUserClientBufferAllocations" = {"Bytes"=0,"Descriptors"=0}
"IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes
}
more details in my comment.
Since macOS 26.4 Beta 1, virtual HID devices created via DriverKit can no longer intercept key events from the built-in MacBook keyboard. External keyboards still work. This is confirmed and tracked here:
https://github.com/pqrs-org/Karabiner-Elements/issues/4402
One possible lead (from LLM-assisted analysis of Apple's open-source IOHIDFamily code and cross-referencing community reports): macOS 26.4 Beta may have introduced or modified a security policy referred to as com.apple.iohid.protectedDeviceAccess, which could block IOHIDDeviceOpen for the Apple Internal Keyboard connected via SPI transport (AppleHIDTransportHIDDevice). This appears related to a "GamePolicy" check in IOHIDDeviceClass.m that gates whether processes can open HID devices. This has not been independently verified and may or may not be the root cause.
This has far-reaching consequences. Karabiner-Elements alone has over 21,000 GitHub stars and is used by hundreds of thousands of macOS users for keyboard customization, accessibility workflows, ergonomic setups, and multilingual input. This change completely breaks its core functionality on any MacBook.
Beyond Karabiner, this affects every developer building keyboard remapping, input customization, or accessibility tooling via DriverKit virtual HID devices — including commercial applications currently in development.
I'd argue that the power and flexibility of keyboard customization on macOS is a genuine competitive advantage for the platform. Developers and power users choose Macs partly because tools like this exist.
Restricting this capability would be detrimental to the ecosystem and to Apple's appeal among professional users.
I'd like to understand: is this an intentional security change or a regression? If intentional, is there a migration path?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Drivers
I have migrated my code to use SMAppService but am running into trouble deleting the old SMJobBless launchd registration using launchd remove. I am invoking this from a root shell when I detect the daemon and associated plist still exist, then also deleting those files.
The remove seems to work (i.e. no errors returned) but launchd list shows the service is registered, with a status code of 28
I am using the same label for SMAppService as previously and suspect this is the reason for the problem. However, I am reluctant to change the label as there will a lot of code changes to do this.
If I quit my application, disable the background job in System Settings and run sudo launchd remove in the Terminal then it is removed and my application runs as expected once the background job is re-enabled. Alternatively, a reboot seems to get things going.
Any suggestions on to how I could do this more effectively welcome.
Hi everyone,
I’m facing an issue with CloudKit sync getting stuck during initial device migration in my SwiftData-based app.
The app follows a local-first architecture using SwiftData + CloudKit sync, and works correctly for:
✔ Incremental sync
✔ Bi-directional updates
✔ Small datasets
However, when onboarding a new device with large historical data, sync becomes extremely slow or appears stuck. Even after two hours data is not fully synced. ~6900 Transactions
🚨 Problem
When installing the app on a new iPhone and enabling iCloud sync:
• Initial hydration starts
• A small amount of data syncs
• Then sync stalls indefinitely
Observed behaviour:
• iPhone → Mac sync works (new changes sync back)
• Mac → iPhone large historical migration gets stuck
• Reinstalling app / clearing container does not resolve issue
• Sync never completes full migration
This gives the impression that:
CloudKit is trickling data but not progressing after a certain threshold.
The architecture is:
• SwiftData local store
• Manual CloudKit sync layer
• Local-first persistence
• Background push/pull sync
So I understand:
✔ Conflict resolution is custom
✔ Initial import may not be optimized by default
But I expected CloudKit to eventually deliver all records.
Instead, the new device remains permanently in a “partial state”.
⸻
🔍 Observations
• No fatal CloudKit errors
• No rate-limit errors
• No quota issues
• iCloud is available
• Sync state remains “Ready”
• Hydration remains “mostlyReady”
Meaning:
CloudKit does not report failure — but data transfer halts.
⸻
🤔 Questions
Would appreciate guidance on:
Is CloudKit designed to support large initial dataset migration via manual sync layers?
Or is this a known limitation vs NSPersistentCloudKitContainer?
⸻
Does CloudKit internally throttle historical record fetches?
Could it silently stall without error when record volume is high?
⸻
Is there any recommended strategy for:
• Bulk initial migration
• Progressive hydration
• Forcing forward sync progress
⸻
Should initial migration be handled outside CloudKit (e.g. via file transfer / backup restore) before enabling sync?
⸻
🎯 Goal
I want to support:
• Large historical onboarding
• Multi-device sync
• User-visible progress
Without forcing migration to Core Data.
⸻
🙏 Any advice on:
• Best practices
• Debugging approach
• CloudKit behavior in such scenarios
would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
iCloud & Data
Tags:
Swift Packages
CloudKit
Swift
Cloud and Local Storage
Our team is in the process of updating our apps to comply with Texas's new state law.
In order to minimize user confusion and provide the most ideal flow to access the app as possible, we have a few questions we would like answered.
Summary of questions:
Is isEligibleForAgeFeatures intended to be accurate and accessible before the user has accepted the Age Range permissions prompt?
As other US states and/or other countries adopt a similar law going forward, will this instance variable cover those locations?
Will the runtime crashes on isEligibleForAgeFeatures and other symbols in the DeclaredAgeRange framework be addressed in a future RC or in the official release?
Details and Investigations:
With regards to isEligibleForAgeFeatures, our team has noticed that this value is always false before the age range prompt has been accepted. This has been tested on the XCode RC 26.2 (17C48).
Assuming the request needs to be accepted first,
isEligibleForAgeFeatures does not get updated immediately when the user chooses to share their age range (updated to true, when our sandbox test account is a Texas resident). Only upon subsequent relaunches of the app does this return a value that reflects the sandbox user's location. Is isEligibleForAgeFeatures intended to be accurate and accessible before the user has accepted the Age Range permissions prompt?
This leads to our follow-up question to clarify whether isEligibleForAgeFeatures explicitly correlates to a user in an affected legal jurisdiction–if future US states and/or other countries adopt a similar law going forward, will this instance variable cover those locations?
Can we also get confirmation about whether the runtime crash on isEligibleForAgeFeatures and other symbols in the DeclaredAgeRange framework will be addressed in a future RC or in the official release?
Thank you.
The documentation for isEligibleForAgeFeatures states:
Use this property to determine whether a person using your app is in an applicable region that requires additional age-related obligations for when you distribute apps on the App Store.
But what does "region" mean?
Is this going to return true if the user has downloaded the app from the US App Store? Or will it go further and geolocate the user and identify them as being within a particular relevant state within the US?
Does our app need to check the location or can we fully reply on this API to decide whether we wanna comply for the law of places that requires age range information? Looks like it's only covering Texas now..? would it add other places by apple..? And also this API is really hard to test a user in other places, Iike I don't know a user in Brazil gonna return true for false now, but the law in Brazil also requires the age information.
'Guideline 2.1 - Performance - App Completeness' - "...could not be found in the submitted binary."
I have checked with internal and external testers and my devices and simulators, everyone sees the in app purchases but I just had my submitted rejected for the second time with the comment that these in-app none-consumable purchases cannot be found with the submitted binary.
I even attached a slow step by step screen recording for the review reply after the first rejection showing how to reach the purchasable packs by navigating through only 3 buttons:
"How to access the purchase flow:
Launch the app
Tap the bottom-center Settings button (icon: switch.2)
Tap “Customisation gallery”
Scroll to find any pack listed above
Tap the pack price chip
Tap “Buy pack – [price]” to start the StoreKit purchase flow"
I also attached a clear image along with detailed instruction (same as above) for the Review Information. and the second rejection was received today for the same reason.
I'm being guided to the localization 'Developer Action Needed'. I'm not sure what more can be done? I feel like my review replies aren't even looked at.
As a part of the video editing app I’m working on, I want to efficiently copy a folder of resources on the same (local) filesystem.
Because iOS is on APFS, cloning (CoW) is an option.
I read the documentation for clonefile(2) which states that cloning a folder works but is strongly discouraged.
I did a small sample project which demonstrates that using clonefile on a folder works correctly and is 10× faster than using FileManager’s copyItem method.
My questions:
The main one I’m interested in: Why is using clonefile for a folder strongly discouraged?
Is FileManager using cloning behind the scenes? Or more exactly how guaranteed are we it will use it? (I know it does, I tried manually cping the resources and it was thousands of times slower.)
If an iPhone receives an incoming call with some partial sip content (for example it contains a name but not an image, or vice versa) and if there is an app enabled for Live Caller ID Lookup, and the result of that lookup supplies data not in the sip (i.e. the lookup returns an image, but not a name, or vice versa). Then could the OS combine data from both sources, or is whatever is returned from the LCIDL what gets displayed in the call screen. I suppose that is the case but just want to enquire to make sure.
Thank you
Hi everyone
I would like to achieve having unidirectional relationships in my SwiftData project (which I believe is possible: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/updates/swiftdata?changes=_9) but I'm afraid I'm struggling to overcome the errors I'm experiencing.
For example, I have the following models:
@Model
final class Quota {
@Attribute(.unique) var id: UUID
var allowance: Int
@Relationship(inverse: nil) var fish: Fish
init(id: UUID = UUID(), fish: Fish, allowance: Int) {
self.id = id
self.fish = fish
self.allowance = allowance
}
}
@Model
final class Fish {
@Attribute(.unique) var id: Int
var name: String
init(id: Int, name: String) {
self.id = id,
self.name = name
}
}
However, when I attempt to save a quota as so:
let quota: Quota = .init(fish: Fish(id: 2, name: "Salmon"), allowance: 50)
modelContext?.insert(quota)
try save()
I keep getting the following error:
SwiftData.DefaultStore save failed with error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=1570 "%{PROPERTY}@ is a required value." UserInfo={NSValidationErrorObject=<NSManagedObject: 0x600002217390> (entity: Fish; id: 0x83319d001151328d <x-coredata://C76A2A64-146E-432F-A565-319B5A2F23F5/Fish/p12>; data: { id = nil; }), NSLocalizedDescription=%{PROPERTY}@ is a required value., NSValidationErrorKey=id, NSValidationErrorValue=null} %{PROPERTY}@ is a required value.
However, if I set up Quota and Fish with an inverse relationship then the data saves as expected, so I'm a little confused. Is there anyone out there who can provide some guidance as to why I'm seeing this error when I try to save a record in SwiftData with no inverse relationship?
I do fully understand about unidirectional vs bidirectional relationships but I have a scenario where I need the relationship to be unidirectional. Also, as a side note, the Fish record already exists in my database, but if I delete it and try to save the record I still see this error.
Thank you so much in advance for any help.
Area
Health & Fitness → HealthKit → Health Records (FHIR Ingestion)
Summary
On devices running iOS 26.2, FHIR Clinical Records successfully connect and validate, but no data (Procedure, DiagnosticReport, Observation, etc.) is ingested into the Health app.
The same FHIR server and patient connection works correctly on iOS 18.1, where all data syncs and displays as expected.
On iOS 26.2:
FHIR validation passes in Health Records
“Last Download Date” updates
Patient data is visible in connection
No clinical data appears in Health app
No apps are listed under Privacy → Health
Device shows “No Data Found”
Crash logs show healthappd terminating during ingestion
This appears to be a regression in the HealthPlatform / HealthKit ingestion pipeline in iOS 26.
Steps to Reproduce
Use an iPhone running iOS 26.2
Open Health app
Add Health Record from FHIR server
Authenticate successfully
Confirm FHIR validation screen shows all resources as “Passed”
Wait for sync to complete
Expected Result
Procedures, DiagnosticReports, Observations, etc. should appear in Health app
Data should be written to HealthKit
Apps should appear under Settings → Privacy & Security → Health
Actual Result
No data appears in Health app
No Procedures, DiagnosticReports, Observations, etc.
Apps section under Health permissions shows “None”
Device shows “No Data Found”
Last Download Date updates correctly
Validation Results (All Passed)
The following FHIR resources show “Passed” in Health validation:
AllergyIntolerance
Condition
DiagnosticReport
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Cardiology
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Pathology
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Radiology
DocumentReference-ClinicalNotes
Immunization
MedicationRequest
Observation-Labs
Observation-VitalSigns
Patient
Procedure
Server responses are correct and return expected data when tested via Postman.
Crash Log Details
Crash occurs in process:
healthappd
Frameworks involved:
HealthPlatform.framework
HealthKit
Combine
Exception:
EXC_BAD_ACCESS
SIGKILL
EXC_ARM_PAC_FAIL
Thread:
com.apple.HealthKit.HKHealthStoreImplementation.client
Stack trace includes:
objc_msgSend
HKSharedSummary
DictionaryStorage.deinit
swift_release_dealloc
objc_destructInstance
Publishers.MergeMany
Future.init
This indicates the ingestion pipeline crashes before data is written to HealthKit.
Comparison Across OS Versions
iOS Version
Result
iOS 18.1
Data syncs correctly
iOS 26.2
No data syncs, healthappd crash
Same:
Same FHIR server
Same patient
Same authentication
Same device model
Same iCloud settings
Additional Notes
OAuth flow succeeds
FHIR validation passes
Server responses are correct
Postman returns correct JSON
No TLS errors
No permission errors
Issue only occurs on iOS 26+
This appears to be a regression in the FHIR ingestion engine introduced after iOS 18.1.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Health & Fitness
Area
Health & Fitness → HealthKit → Health Records (FHIR Ingestion)
Summary
On devices running iOS 26.2, FHIR Clinical Records successfully connect and validate, but no data (Procedure, DiagnosticReport, Observation, etc.) is ingested into the Health app.
The same FHIR server and patient connection works correctly on iOS 18.1, where all data syncs and displays as expected.
On iOS 26.2:
FHIR validation passes in Health Records
“Last Download Date” updates
Patient data is visible in connection
No clinical data appears in Health app
No apps are listed under Privacy → Health
Device shows “No Data Found”
Crash logs show healthappd terminating during ingestion
This appears to be a regression in the HealthPlatform / HealthKit ingestion pipeline in iOS 26.
Steps to Reproduce
Use an iPhone running iOS 26.2
Open Health app
Add Health Record from FHIR server
Authenticate successfully
Confirm FHIR validation screen shows all resources as “Passed”
Wait for sync to complete
Expected Result
Procedures, DiagnosticReports, Observations, etc. should appear in Health app
Data should be written to HealthKit
Apps should appear under Settings → Privacy & Security → Health
Actual Result
No data appears in Health app
No Procedures, DiagnosticReports, Observations, etc.
Apps section under Health permissions shows “None”
Device shows “No Data Found”
Last Download Date updates correctly
Validation Results (All Passed)
The following FHIR resources show “Passed” in Health validation:
AllergyIntolerance
Condition
DiagnosticReport
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Cardiology
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Pathology
DiagnosticReport-ClinicalNotes-Radiology
DocumentReference-ClinicalNotes
Immunization
MedicationRequest
Observation-Labs
Observation-VitalSigns
Patient
Procedure
Server responses are correct and return expected data when tested via Postman.
Crash Log Details
Crash occurs in process:
healthappd
Frameworks involved:
HealthPlatform.framework
HealthKit
Combine
Exception:
EXC_BAD_ACCESS
SIGKILL
EXC_ARM_PAC_FAIL
Thread:
com.apple.HealthKit.HKHealthStoreImplementation.client
Stack trace includes:
objc_msgSend
HKSharedSummary
DictionaryStorage.deinit
swift_release_dealloc
objc_destructInstance
Publishers.MergeMany
Future.init
This indicates the ingestion pipeline crashes before data is written to HealthKit.
Comparison Across OS Versions
iOS Version
Result
iOS 18.1
Data syncs correctly
iOS 26.2
No data syncs, healthappd crash
Same:
Same FHIR server
Same patient
Same authentication
Same device model
Same iCloud settings
Additional Notes
OAuth flow succeeds
FHIR validation passes
Server responses are correct
Postman returns correct JSON
No TLS errors
No permission errors
Issue only occurs on iOS 26+
This appears to be a regression in the FHIR ingestion engine introduced after iOS 18.1.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Health & Fitness
I set the value of NSURLHasHiddenExtensionKey. I provide a textfield to rename a file and I set this flag based on whether the user has deleted or left on the path extension.
So -setResourceValue:forKey:error: returns YES, does not populate the error, but does not honor the value I just set it to.
I'm always setting it off the main thread on the same serial queue. Works the first time I rename the file then it just starts failing (silently).
For example:
NSError *setError = nil;
if ([theURL setResourceValue:@(NO) forKey:NSURLHasHiddenExtensionKey error:&setError])
{
[theURL removeAllCachedResourceValues];
NSNumber *freshRead = nil;
NSError *getError = nil;
if ([theURL getResourceValue:&freshRead forKey:NSURLHasHiddenExtensionKey error:&getError])
{
if (freshRead.boolValue)
{
NSLog(@"it is yes when it should be NO.");
}
}
if (getError != nil)
{
NSLog(@"Get error: %@",getError);
}
}
if (setError != nil)
{
NSLog(@"Set error: %@",setError);
}
While I get that it is possible for there to be other apps setting this value at the same time as my app, doesn't really seem possible in my local environment right now.
No errors log out but "it is yes when it should be NO." does log out.
I'm building a macOS network monitor using NEFilterDataProvider as a system extension, distributed with Developer ID signing. On macOS 26.3 (Tahoe), sysextd consistently rejects the activation request with "no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications" — despite the app being in /Applications and passing every verification check.
I'm aware of the known Xcode NE signing bug (r. 108838909) and have followed the manual signing process from Exporting a Developer ID Network Extension. I've also tried both xcodebuild build and xcodebuild archive workflows — identical failure.
Environment
macOS
26.3 (25D125), SIP enabled
Xcode
26.3 (17C529)
Hardware
Apple M2 Pro
Certificate
Developer ID Application (issued Jan 30, 2026 — 27 days old)
MDM/Profiles
None installed
Signing & Verification (all pass)
$ spctl -a -vv /Applications/Chakshu.app
/Applications/Chakshu.app: accepted
source=Notarized Developer ID
origin=Developer ID Application: ROBIN SHARMA (R65679C4F3)
$ codesign --verify --deep --strict -vv /Applications/Chakshu.app
/Applications/Chakshu.app: valid on disk
/Applications/Chakshu.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement
$ xcrun stapler validate /Applications/Chakshu.app
The validate action worked!
App signing:
Authority=Developer ID Application: ROBIN SHARMA (R65679C4F3)
Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority
Authority=Apple Root CA
TeamIdentifier=R65679C4F3
Runtime Version=26.2.0
Notarization Ticket=stapled
App entitlements:
com.apple.application-identifier = R65679C4F3.dev.indrasvat.chakshu
com.apple.developer.team-identifier = R65679C4F3
com.apple.developer.system-extension.install = true
com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = [content-filter-provider-systemextension]
keychain-access-groups = [R65679C4F3.*]
Extension signing: Same Developer ID authority, same team, same timestamp. Extension entitlements match (minus system-extension.install). Developer ID provisioning profiles are embedded in both app and extension.
What sysextd logs
Captured Feb 26, 2026 from log stream --predicate 'process == "sysextd"':
sysextd [com.apple.sx:XPC] client activation request for dev.indrasvat.chakshu.filter
sysextd attempting to realize extension with identifier dev.indrasvat.chakshu.filter
sysextd (Security) SecKeyVerifySignature ← pass (×2)
sysextd (Security) SecTrustEvaluateIfNecessary ← pass (×2)
sysextd [com.apple.xpc:connection] activating connection: name=com.apple.CodeSigningHelper
sysextd [com.apple.xpc:connection] invalidated after the last release
sysextd no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications
sysextd [com.apple.sx:XPC] client connection invalidated
Signature and trust evaluation pass. CodeSigningHelper completes. Then the policy check fails. The app receives OSSystemExtensionError code 4 (extensionNotFound).
What I've tried and ruled out
Build process:
Approach
Result
xcodebuild build -configuration Release + manual re-sign
Same failure
xcodebuild archive + export from archive + manual re-sign (per thread/737894)
Same failure
Minimal hand-crafted Xcode project (no xcodegen, trivial code)
Same failure
Both workflows follow Quinn's process exactly: build with Apple Development → copy app → embed Developer ID provisioning profiles → re-sign inside-out (extension first, then app) with -systemextension suffix entitlements → notarize → staple → install to /Applications.
System-level checks:
Rebooting — no change
Killing sysextd — no change
Removing com.apple.quarantine xattr — no change
chown root:wheel on app bundle — no change
lsregister -r (reset Launch Services) — no change
Waiting 27 days for certificate propagation — no change
Reinstalling via Finder drag-to-Applications — no change
No MDM or configuration profiles installed
/Library/SystemExtensions/db.plist shows extensionPolicies: [] (empty)
Key observation
Pre-existing network extensions activated before macOS 26 work fine on this machine. For example, Tailscale's NEPacketTunnelProvider shows state: activated_enabled in the system extensions database — it was activated on a prior macOS version and is still running. Only new system extension activations fail.
I've seen similar Tahoe-specific reports from LuLu (same NEFilterDataProvider type, Developer ID distribution):
LuLu #825
LuLu #831
Questions
Is this a known regression in macOS 26's sysextd policy evaluation for new Developer ID system extension activations?
sysextd's policy check fails after all signature and trust evaluation succeeds. Is there a separate trust/policy path that sysextd consults beyond what spctl, codesign, and CodeSigningHelper verify?
Is there anything else I should be checking?
I have a sysdiagnose captured immediately after the failure, a minimal reproducer project, and full raw sysextd logs available on request.
We recently developed the provisional permission for our app, but we have noticed that is not working as expected in iOS 16 (We have tested only there).
Currently we request the permissions like this:
UNUserNotificationCenter.current().requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .badge, .sound, .provisional]) { [weak self] _, _ in
// here we register for pushes in case authorizationStatus is provisional or authorised
}
What happens is we do get the 1st notification with the keep CTA - once tapped we see that there pops an action: "Deliver Immediately", but even though the user selects that, we still see under setting the pushes are marked as "Deliver Quietly".
In addition to this the sound and bage still stay as toggled off - and the lock screen and banner as well stay off.
Basically, nothing changes after the user selects "Deliver Immediately"
Hello,
I have an app that is using iOS 26 Network Framework APIs.
It is using QUIC, TLS 1.3 and Bonjour. For TLS I am using a PKCS#12 identity.
All works well and as expected if the devices (iPhone with no cellular, iPhone with cellular, and iPad no cellular) are all on the same wifi network.
If I turn off my router (ie no more wifi network) and leave on the wifi toggle on the iOS devices - only the non cellular iPhone and iPad are able to discovery and connect to each other. My iPhone with cellular is not able to.
By sharing my logs with Cursor AI it was determined that the connection between the two problematic peers (iPad with no cellular and iPhone with cellular) never even makes it to the TLS step because I never see the logs where I print out the certs I compare.
I tried doing "builder.requiredInterfaceType(.wifi)" but doing that blocked the two non cellular devices from working. I also tried "builder.prohibitedInterfaceTypes([.cellular])" but that also did not work.
Is AWDL on it's way out? Should I focus my energy on Wi-Fi Aware?
Regards,
Captadoh
Hi everyone,
I’ve filed a Feedback report (FB20986470) for a serious issue affecting the Call Directory database when add phone numbers for call blocking.
When adding blocking numbers to a Call Directory extension, the system’s CallKit database (/private/var/mobile/Library/CallDirectory/CallDirectory.db) becomes corrupted.
The reload call (reloadExtensionWithIdentifier) fails with error code 11 when the system tries to insert blocking entries, and the Console app on macOS shows the following errors:
database corruption page 2265525 of /private/var/mobile/Library/CallDirectory/CallDirectory.db at line 81343 of [f0ca7bba1c]
database corruption at line 79387 of [f0ca7bba1c]
Error Domain=com.apple.callkit.database.sqlite Code=11 "sqlite3_step for query 'INSERT INTO PhoneNumberBlockingEntry (extension_id, phone_number_id) VALUES (?, (SELECT id FROM PhoneNumber WHERE (number = ?))), (?, (SELECT id FROM PhoneNumber WHERE (number = ?))),...)'"
After this happens, CallKit becomes fully corrupted on the device and no further numbers can be added, even after:
Disabling and re-enabling the extension
Restarting the device (either force or soft restart)
Reinstalling the app
Waiting for a couple of minutes after this issue happens (that CallKit could possibly self-recovered)
I also tested other call-blocking apps, and they all fail with the same error. The only thing that recovers the system is a full “Reset All Settings.”
This issue has been reported by many users of my app, across multiple iOS versions and devices.
Similar related issue reported by another developer:
https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/806129
Steps to Reproduce:
Enable the Call Directory extension from a call-blocking app.
Add and reload blocking numbers (a few thousand entries).
Perform multiple reloads between additions.
Check the Console, the corruption errors appear.
From this point, all insert attempts fail system-wide.
Expected Result:
Entries should be inserted successfully, or the system should self-recover without persistent corruption.
Actual Result:
sqlite3_step fails with Code=11, and the Call Directory database remains corrupted until the user resets all settings.
Additional Notes:
All numbers are sorted and deduplicated before insertion.
Happens intermittently after multiple reloads.
The system log always shows internal database failure.
Environment:
Device: iPhone 16 Plus
iOS 18.2 Beta (23C5027f)
Xcode 16.1 (17B55)
Attachments (included in Feedback FB20986470):
sysdiagnose captured immediately after the failure (with Phone app General Profile)
It seems like a system-level corruption affecting all Call Directory extensions once it occurs.
Hello Apple Support Team,
We are seeing a production crash on iOS 26 devices that appears to originate from Apple system frameworks rather than application code.
1. Crash Details
OS Version: iOS 26.x
App built with: Xcode 16
Devices: Multiple models (not device-specific)
Exception Type: SIGSEGV SEGV_ACCERR
Fault Address: 0x0000000000000100
Crashed Thread: 4 (network background queue)
Crash trace summary:
Last Exception :
0 libobjc.A.dylib _objc_release_x8 + 8
1 libboringssl.dylib _nw_protocol_boringssl_deallocate_options + 92
2 Network 0x000000019695207c 0x00000001968dc000 + 483452
3 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
4 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
5 Network 0x0000000196951f6c 0x00000001968dc000 + 483180
6 Network 0x0000000196952000 0x00000001968dc000 + 483328
7 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
8 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
9 libswiftCore.dylib void multiPayloadEnumFN<&handleRefCountsDestroy>(swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*, swift::LayoutStringReader1&, unsigned long&, unsigned char*) + 248
10 libswiftCore.dylib swift::swift_cvw_arrayDestroy(swift::OpaqueValue*, unsigned long, unsigned long, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 1172
11 libswiftCore.dylib _$sSp12deinitialize5countSvSi_tF + 40
12 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1236
13 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 388
14 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1044
15 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
16 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
17 Network 0x000000019695f9fc 0x00000001968dc000 + 539132
18 Network 0x000000019695f9bc 0x00000001968dc000 + 539068
19 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
20 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
21 libswiftCore.dylib swift_cvw_destroyImpl(swift::OpaqueValue*, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 212
22 Network 0x0000000196def5d8 0x00000001968dc000 + 5322200
23 Network 0x0000000196ded130 0x00000001968dc000 + 5312816
24 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
25 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
26 Network 0x000000019695fde0 0x00000001968dc000 + 540128
27 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116
28 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76
29 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72
30 Network 0x000000019695f99c 0x00000001968dc000 + 539036
31 Network 0x000000019695fae4 0x00000001968dc000 + 539364
32 Network 0x0000000196b078b8 0x00000001968dc000 + 2275512
33 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116
34 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76
35 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72
36 Network 0x0000000196b07658 0x00000001968dc000 + 2274904
37 Network 0x00000001968e51d4 nw_queue_context_async_if_needed + 92
38 Network 0x0000000197686ea0 0x00000001968dc000 + 14331552
39 libswiftCore.dylib swift::swift_cvw_arrayDestroy(swift::OpaqueValue*, unsigned long, unsigned long, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 436
40 libswiftCore.dylib _$sSp12deinitialize5countSvSi_tF + 40
41 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1236
42 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 388
43 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1044
44 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56
45 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152
46 Network 0x000000019694a010 0x00000001968dc000 + 450576
47 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116
48 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76
49 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72
50 Network 0x0000000196a330e0 0x00000001968dc000 + 1405152
51 Network 0x00000001974378e0 0x00000001968dc000 + 11909344
52 Network 0x0000000196a17178 0x00000001968dc000 + 1290616
53 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_call_block_and_release + 32
54 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_client_callout + 16
55 libdispatch.dylib _dispatch_workloop_invoke.cold.4 + 32
56 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_workloop_invoke + 1980
57 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 292
58 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 692
59 libsystem_pthread.dylib __pthread_wqthread + 292
------
Exception Type: SIGSEGV SEGV_ACCERR
Exception Codes: fault addr: 0x0000000000000100
Crashed Thread: 4
2. Behavior & Context
The crash occurs during normal HTTPS networking using standard URLSession (no direct usage of Network.framework nor boringssl APIs).
It appears to be triggered during QUIC connection establishment or TLS fallback.
The stack trace contains no application code frames — all symbols are from system libraries.
The crash strongly indicates double-free, over-release, or dangling pointer inside nw_protocol_boringssl_options deallocation.
3. Questions for Apple
Is this a known issue in iOS 26 within Network.framework / boringssl related to nw_protocol_boringssl_deallocate_options?
What is the root cause of the over‑release / invalid objc_release in this path?
Is there a workaround we can implement from the app side (e.g., disabling QUIC, adjusting TLS settings, or queue configuration)?
Do you have a target iOS version or patch where this issue will be fixed?
We can provide full crash logs and additional metrics upon request.
4. Additional Information
Developed using Swift 5, with a deployment target of iOS 12+.
Thank you for your support.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking